3.17.2012

Someone Took Their Meds Today!

& I don't mean Viagra...Regarding Jessica the Jailbird's arrest, Father Peeter says:
It is important to recognize just how many people in Ayla's life, or surrounding and impacting her life, cannot stay out of legal trouble.

This is no different than showing Lance DiPietro beating up someone. Should I post the news about Lance but not about Jessica? Is that fair?

I would not trust a puppy in the environment on either side.

It is cases like these where sometimes the choice is the lesser of two evils; which one will likely do less harm to a child.

It stinks.

No new laws can change these things. There is no law that tells someone to set a good example for a child, nor can there be.
At least some people are starting to see through the loving, caring, devoted image that Twisted Sista Trista has tried to hard to portray...

34 comments:

  1. YRUobscuringTheTRUTH3/17/12, 10:30 AM

    Well... "Someone" must have "taken their meds today", but it certainly wasn't Miss Obscures The TRUTH!
    ;)

    (AND I guess her two post streak of "ORIGINALITY" is over, and she's back to answering posts from other blogs!)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Braids N inkwells3/17/12, 10:44 AM

      The viagra comment was wicked weird, too!
      Wonder if she has some school girl crush on her (supposed) arch-enemy, "Peeter" Hyatt?

      Delete
    2. ST sure reads alot over on STATEMENT ANALYSIS. When it is too quiet here, guess where she is?? heheeheee...

      Delete
    3. Seeking is doomed to having her love for Peter forever unrequited. He seems quite happily married, and his wife, Heather, is gorgeous, from what I hear.
      (Not that Peter seems the type who would go for a low class, psychotic, skank like the Lies blogger even IF he was single!!)
      LMFAO.
      Stick to the boys your kind is worthy of, Seeking.
      Child killers and wannabe gangsta thugs!

      Delete
    4. Peter is not so perfect. Everyone has skeletons...

      Delete
    5. I know some of his skeletons are quite outragous if someone were to say dig into his past. Ifyou like sordid tales, do a little investigating on precious Peeeeeter

      Delete
    6. I heard somewhere that in the state he was living in before he took children away from some families who were "living in sin", ie not married and that he thought not good enough. It may be worth investigating

      Delete
    7. @hearsay

      Its VERY worth investigating. Ive done my homework.

      Delete
    8. yeah I'm sure "Peeter's" skeletons have a lot to do with Ayla. You guys are ridiculous, It'd be a funny joke if it wasn't a missing baby case. The obscure one is sick and devious and you guys just play right along with her, it's pathetic.
      GET HELP PLEASE

      Delete
  2. BOMBSHELL: TEXT MESSAGES!3/17/12, 11:10 AM

    http://i43.tinypic.com/1z35h1s.jpg
    Put on your thinking caps guys. Hoax or Not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Im going with hoax. Way to much is blurred for it to be considered genuine.

      Delete
  3. Braids N inkwells3/17/12, 11:11 AM

    sT/obscure/whoever she is, also has panned SA as "junk science". She accuses her lover-boy "Peeter" of making things up, or, consulting a crystal ball, when HE does SA on players in Ayla's case...
    But, THEN she goes on to make feeble attempts at "SA", herself, when it suits HER agenda?
    Hypocrite, much?

    ReplyDelete
  4. BOMBSHELL: TEXT MESSAGES!3/17/12, 11:36 AM

    OPEN MIND DUFUS!
    Ask yourself a simple question. Is there ANYTHING to lose by hoping?
    I would love to find out these crumb bums have hidden this baby!
    Why do you try to shut that avenue down?
    YOU DON"T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED!
    Go fight your blog wars somewhere else. Don't EVEN read here! TIA!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. There is plenty that can be lost through futile "hoping".

      One may lose:

      *Closure.

      *Time that could be devoted to searching out JUSTICE, rather than for a *non-existent* living child.

      *LE resources (which are in SHORT supply BTW due to economy) which get wasted tracking down useless "leads" to locate a living, kidnapped, victim which doesn't even exist.

      *Faith that the justice system can function effectively, the longer this is allowed to drag on needlessly.

      Delete
    2. Snark attack3/17/12, 9:23 PM

      A child who is missing deserves to be looked for. There is no evidence that that child has been harmed. So it LE's job to "waste" their time falling leads. It is what they are paid to do. Hopefully you never have a child or loved one missing and Karma bites you in the butt. Because not sure at what point you would want LE to give up on your loved one and stop wasting their time or our tax dollars on it? Might feel different if the shoes were on your feet. And you can say all you want that it never would be. Don't kid yourself you are always the first suspect. End of story. And it is your job to prove your innocence. So good luck with Karma you have tempted it.

      Delete
    3. Ummm...
      Yes.
      There IS evidence "the child" has been harmed.

      Ayla's arm was broken, and then, police found evidence that a concerning amount of her blood was spilled in the DiPs' basement--she was NEVER TREATED for a blood-loss injury--and the police say "someone" tried to cover it up.

      Delete
    4. They said they found more than a small cut would produce. They never said that it was a concerning amount. It could have been a larger cut, a cut on her mouth, a bloody nose. All of which happen on toddlers pretty routinely. They trip, they fall, they bump something. And I seem to have missed where it was "covered" up. Cleaned up, yes. Do you leave blood on the floor of your home to just dry without cleaning it up? I'm pretty sure no one does that.

      Delete
    5. Hi Hope, yes, the police said the blood was "troubling". A troubling amount is definitely a "concerning" amount. I've reared six kids and yes, there's a lot of bumps, scrapes, bruises, but, rarely blood in the majority of toddler injuries.

      Delete
  5. BOMBSHELL: TEXT MESSAGES!3/17/12, 11:52 AM

    Maybe Peeter could check the Maine gov database and TELL us what 'warrant' for Jess means..
    :O

    What does 'warrant' mean?
    I was arrested once, shoplifting cigs in 1973? (mwah J4A), But I haven't had any 'hands on' experience with the 'system' since..I don't even know what 'warrant' means?
    warrant to appear?
    warrant to arrest?
    warrant to TELL US WHERE IS AYLA?

    *any fill the dots welcome Tia.
    Puleeze don't make me ask Cobra! :)))

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LegalEagleURnot3/17/12, 12:06 PM

      war·rant/ˈwôrənt/
      Noun:
      A document issued by a legal or government official authorizing the police or some other body to make an arrest, search premises, or...: "an extradition warrant"
      ***************************************

      You are welcome, BTW..

      Sincerely,

      --DUFUS

      Delete
  6. What was Jessica arrested for? Does anyone else have relatives who are less than perfect? Did Trista get arrested. no it was her auunt not her. *

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, but I wouldn't allow them to babysit my children.

      Delete
    2. Failure to pay a parking ticket? I would still let them babysit my child. What was the warrent for and was she served a warrent or arrested? *

      Delete
    3. @ sunny

      you would let them babysit? Jess has had her children taken away, she's violent, are clearly a troubled family, and could potentially know where Ayla or be involved in Ayla's disappearance and you would still let them babysit! I think that's crazy.

      Delete
    4. Sunny look her up she will prob be out on bail and need a job. And who cares if she has lost two children and had to have them put up for adoption. And she has a history of a violent temper. I mean she would probably not show that around your child or take it out on your child. So by all means help her out with that "parking ticket" Offer to let her babysit your child. What a great parent and nice person you are.

      Delete
    5. I am not , "up" enought on who is who. I said if someone had a warrent for an unpaid parking ticket I would let them babysit. But this aunt who had children taken away. No, of course I would not let her babysit my children.*

      Delete
    6. @ Sunny

      My mistake. I did misread. I agree with you:)

      Delete
  7. BOMBSHELL: TEXT MESSAGES!3/17/12, 12:01 PM

    Steve McCausland of the Maine Department of Public Safety says investigators have received more than 970 leads, and detectives continue to conduct interviews. He says the crime lab is providing new evidence almost daily.
    http://www.onlinesentinel.com/news/Search-for-Ayla-Reynolds-hits-3-month-mark.html
    update.........

    ReplyDelete
  8. I wonder if the new evidence found almost daily has something to do with Jessica Reynolds' warrant

    ReplyDelete
  9. Could it be that the crime lab is also testing stuff at Jessica Reynolds' place as a warrant was issued against her a week ago or it's not related ?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Sandy, you must be as dumb as Lies. Sure, the police are really concerned with Jessica's warrant, NOT! You're kidding right?
    If the police were concerned with Jessica's place and thought it was related, do you think they would announce that Ayla wasn't kidnapped and that the Dips are lying? Use your brain instead of acting like a Lies wannabe

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The police will use all different tactics in investigations. You use your brain. Oh never mind that is a waste of my breath.

      Delete
  11. LucifersHand ,Would you let Justin or Courtney babysit your kids?

    ReplyDelete

ALL comments subject to removal. MODERATION becomes necessary when ignorance shows up. Don't be that person!