7.31.2012

Devil's Advocate---Kinda?

A disgrace chief talks about money in Ayla's case (Am I the only one who can't figure out what the title means?)

Waterville taxpayers should all ask the chief of police to step down ASAP. How would this help? During the middle of an investigation (of this magnitude) replacing the chief would just delay things further.

He has made the disappearance of Ayla Reynolds a money problem. How? It seems to me as though he has used resources and conducted searches without regard for money. In my opinion, that's an even bigger problem. They have searched areas just to "eliminate" them. After receiving more than a thousand leads, you would think they would be searching areas of interest by now. By the way, MSP may be footing the bill---not Waterville PD.

I am outraged that we have a little girl who probably is dead out there, and we have three people who were there that night. I can understand the outrage that she's still out there. Although I disagree that she's dead, I am just as outraged that she is still "missing." People can harp on the fact that there were 3 people there that night all they want. It doesn't change the FACT that MSP/WPD do not have evidence that those 3 people caused Ayla's disappearance. I say "fact" because if they have such evidence, it's reckless, irresponsible, unethical, and dangerous to not have made an arrest.

No arrest, no Ayla, no information and all the chief can tell us is how much this is costing. I think this is an unfair characterization. Anyone who has followed the case knows that the chief and MSP have released more details than just their budget. Is it a bit tacky to release how much the investigation is costing thus far? I think so, especially when law enforcement could bottom line a lot of other things in this case. I haven't seen this happen before (LE saying we spent X amount so far, during the middle of a missing child investigation), but I'm sure it happens.

It think he's a disgrace to his uniform. There are a lot of things that disgrace the uniform, but your sentiments don't exactly rise to that level. You are Monday morning quarterbacking the decisions and actions of your local police department. You care about Ayla, so wouldn't you support the agency at least until there's closure---or until it looks as though the agency has completely bungled this?

I wonder how much would be too much if it was his child? This is another unfair question. It's not his child, so to ask this question is just...stupid.

He and his people should just find her. People like you should just let them do their jobs. If you can do better, then suit up.

I try not to be critical of law enforcement, but in this particular case I have been at times. I think there are a lot of reasons to criticize them, but the money spent (or unspent) on this investigation is not a problem in my mind.

18 comments:

  1. the space between7/31/12, 3:20 PM

    I believe the mention of the money, the hours put in, the visible searches etc. - is partly to assure the public because the case isn't progressing. They are letting the public know they are working on it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't really want to criticize Mr. McDonald's comment, but umm..
    seriously, when someone says;
    "He and his people should just find her"
    How could one not be critcal of his comment?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. the space between7/31/12, 6:55 PM

      S- I think I missed something. Who is Mr. McDonald?

      Delete
    2. the space between7/31/12, 7:30 PM

      I found the comment.

      Obscure, my understanding is
      "(It's) a disgrace (that the police) chief talks about money in Ayla's case."

      Delete
    3. sort of o/t

      In recent months, the number of 2 year olds that have been found wandering and/or without an adult in Waterville is shocking.

      http://www.kjonline.com/news/2-year-old-returnedto-his-sitter_2012-07-30.html

      Delete
    4. the space between7/31/12, 8:07 PM

      person says Washington sightings "a mistake"

      http://www.krem.com/your-news/164508266.html

      Delete
    5. Yes in Maine in recent months there have been several incidents of small children walking out of their homes unnoticed. One incident the child was missing several hours when police knocked on parents door and had to break down door and wake parents up at bedside to alert them to fact their child had walked out. So scary.

      Delete
    6. That toddlers name is Hope. Very fitting. She had walked alone in the snow- having stopped at the hall closet and put on her ruby shoes to go for a midnight walk. More than a mile away (don't quote the distance but it was far for a two yr old) she stopped and sat in a parking lot until near dawn when she was spotted by steangers. No one knew who she was and they traced the snowy footprints back to her house. Where the door was still open and the family still fast asleep. They all slept through knocking and being called, finally awaking to authorities standing in their room. Yes, MSP, I can see your point about it being "not possible " for a family to sleep through someone walking in, picking up a sleeping toddler, and walking out. (Sarcasm.) Now- if little Hope hadn't had the good luck of her jaunt taking place after a snowfall that preserved her steps.... what EVIDENCE would there have been? Surely her fingerprints are always all over walls and doorknobs. They would not have indicated that she had just that "night/morning" put her own shoes on and opened the door. But dogs would have picked up her scent. Something that won't happen if a child has been carried out by an adult and put in the car- never stepping foot on the ground.

      Delete
    7. Selena Johnson8/1/12, 11:08 PM

      @ Pescara07:51

      Thank you!

      Delete
    8. If Ayla had walked out on her own they would have found her. . . if someone in the house carried her out and transported her somewhere it would be much tougher for LE or MSP or FBI to find her unless that someone spoke up. . . the evidence of an abduction are not there. The people in that house are not saying all they know. . . they can sit as quiet as they want, eventually this will be solved and they will go down for the crimes they committed!

      Delete
    9. more questions8/2/12, 12:20 PM

      Great post, Pescara!

      Delete
    10. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  3. I'm sorry to be off topic, but I just have to point this out.

    Jeff.. 7:29
    "Even though I have been busy, I review UFA’s latest comments every day"

    Jeff..7:31
    .. "I was not aware that the e-mail had been released until last Friday. I only look at the blogs on the Ayla’s Angels page of this site"

    If he reads the comments every day as he said, then he was aware of the release of the email long before Friday.
    Does he even remember what he says?

    Neither did he address the real concerns about the email in his latest post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for taking the time to point it out S. It amazes me how their supporters don't follow these discrepancies and make note. They seem good at imagining false statements but ironically aren't so good at spotting real ones.

      Delete
  4. He is not aware of what he says. Liars rarely are. It is very hard to keep their stories straight. Anyone notice Jeff and Trista having to keep changing their stories? Or coming back with a back up answer or story to explain their previous story?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Anon. Yes we do notice it. It blows my mind that these things need to be pointed out by us and by Obscure via this blog. Evidently we are surrounded by narrow minded idiots in this world who love to SAY that they are logical and objective but are really anything but. What stands out is the Dipietros have not done the same. Even Phoebe's understandable mistake when she did an interview extremely early in the investigation and didn't know which things LE wished her not to disclose does not in any way amount to a changed story. Not only was that irrelevant since she had never lied to LE about her whereabouts and was just caught off guard by the question- but she scrambled to get CNN to correct it before airing it on television. They chose not to. Imagine that... a tv show producer opted to go with whatever made it appear to be scandalous! SMH. Who's surprised. And that friend with the website for Ayla who recounted the events in a way that seemed to have the sister going downstairs to alert Justin rather than the girlfriend- even that (1) can't be attributed to the Dipieteos since they had nothing to do with the writing of anything on that site and (2) was only how it was worded that made it seem that way. It was not even stated as to who walked down the stairs. The point being that those are the *extent* of any "changed" stories and yet the Justin haters call the entire family liars and "dipshits" while fully ignoring the loaded arsenal of lies that Trista and family have been spouting and caught in. Again...shaking My Head. -yb

      Delete
    2. Selena Johnson8/1/12, 11:12 PM

      Thanks for noticing. :)

      Delete
    3. more questions8/2/12, 9:41 AM

      Exactly, anon. Take, for instance, the pulled leg muscle. They had a story, but came under fire because Trista waited a week to seek medical treatment. It's hard to defend that when they are bashing Justin for waiting to take Ayla in for the broken arm. What to do, what to do....oh, let's say that Trista was told to wait a week! Seems like an easy answer. The only problem is, like most of their lies, they didn't think it through. The funny walk wasn't noticed until Friday evening, according to them. The clinic where Trista takes Ayla is only open Monday-Friday. The earliest Trista could've spoken with anyone is Monday. Oh, I suppose an answering service could have patched her through to the doctor over the weekend, but we all know there isn't a doctor on the planet that wouldve told Trista to just wait a WEEK. Besides, the original account said that after a few days, Ayla wasn't getting any better. Sounds to me like she waited a few days to make the call. So if she called on Monday, or Tuesday, or whenever, they wouldve just made an appointment. No "wait a week." Why does any of it matter? It really doesn't except it shows that they'd rather spin a web of lies than defend the truth.

      Delete

ALL comments subject to removal. MODERATION becomes necessary when ignorance shows up. Don't be that person!