Jeff says Trista had been asking about the blanket since day 1.
We saw that Trista asked Justin for Ayla's clothes, especially the "new ones".
Why didn't Trista ask for the blanket back as well, since she was so worried about where it was?
Keep talking Jeff. You've opened your mouth and inserted your foot about 30 times now. Keep talking.
Oh, and I'm done commenting on that other blog for now. I've deleted my comments, to save JunkiesforAyla the trouble, but John P, you are even more nuts than I thought. Look at your own commenting history, you're a rambling old fart. Get well soon! :)
4.29.2012
Another BS Update
All of this latest hoopla is about a picture that was found? I am waiting for something in mainstream media to address this, because Jeffrey has proven himself to be an unreliable source.
BTW Jeffrey, when your blog comes back up, you need to "correct" your timeline AGAIN and add Trista's November 3rd visit to Waterville. You have no credibility. None. You screwed up the "cup o'blood", now you're just saying random things. I thought you needed a break? *poof* be gone!
BTW Jeffrey, when your blog comes back up, you need to "correct" your timeline AGAIN and add Trista's November 3rd visit to Waterville. You have no credibility. None. You screwed up the "cup o'blood", now you're just saying random things. I thought you needed a break? *poof* be gone!
4.28.2012
False Alarm?
I did say I wouldn't comment on the new evidence, but I received an email that changed my mind a bit...
First of all, why is Jeffrey's blog vanished? And his Facebook? I won't make any insinuations there, I am just curious about the timing. In order to take a break, one simply has to log out. Why wouldn't you want the blog to still be preserved and available to the public? That's the only way to get and keep the information out there. Numerous news articles link to the blog...now people will be re-routed somewhere else. That blog is a treasure trove of information. HMMM...
Secondly, I heard from a person, who heard from a person, who heard from another person, that another person was told, that another person has reason to believe that one of the items found is going to be Ayla's pajamas. Yes, the infamous "Daddy's Princess" pajamas that Ayla was reportedly wearing on the night she vanished.
I find this possibility very interesting. I'll start by showing you comments about the pajamas, then I will discuss.
Now, after reading that, it seems like a pretty juvenile disagreement, right? Jessica says she bought the pajamas, Phoebe says she bought the pajamas. Jessica INSISTS that she bought the pajamas, but Jeff says it's also plausible that Phoebe did buy them. Let's not forget that Jeff also said this:
That in itself sounds weird. Does anyone buy clothes hoping to send a message to someone? Isn't that rather childish? Why use a child and her clothes to communicate, instead of voicing your concerns to the adult? Only in Maine. ???
There are a few scenarios to explore, assuming that the pajamas were one of the items found. I will not compose an actual theory, until it's confirmed that pajamas were in fact found. I will give my rather random thoughts, and maybe some of you will add yours.
Here we go:
Phoebe buys Ayla the "Daddy's Princess" pajamas before Justin even gets custody of Ayla. Jessica, of course, has seen the pajamas and would probably know where to purchase them. I'm not familiar with Waterville or Maine, but I'm thinking small towns and cities, not a lot of shopping variety. Even if I'm wrong about that, I think it's still reasonable to assume that Jessica would know where to buy identical pajamas to the ones Phoebe has purchased. When she would have purchased them is beyond me. It could have been after Ayla went to live with Justin, it could have been after Ayla disappeared.
Fast forward. Ayla vanishes, and she just so happens to be wearing the pajamas that Jessica says she has purchased and given to Justin. That's an even bigger slap in the face, considering that Jessica says she bought the pajamas hoping that Justin would "live up" to the saying on the pajamas.
After almost 5 months, the pajamas are found---but not Ayla. The DiPietro family is suspected by the masses, but why would they have any reason to remove Ayla's clothes before hypothetically discarding her body? It's not as though finding Ayla deceased in the river would be any worse if she was wearing clothes that are bloodstained. Also, there's no indication that she was a victim of sexual abuse (I hate to even type that, but clothing removed could indicate a sexual element). Why would her pajamas be found, and why would she not be wearing them?
Speculation ONLY:
It was important for Jessica to say that she GAVE the pajamas to Justin when he came to get Ayla. This is another point where Jeffrey changed the timeline. At first, Justin waited downstairs, now Justin actually entered the apartment. Jessica refused to open the door, and did not want Justin to take Ayla. Ayla was traumatized, to the point of biting an officer, but Jessica remains calm and collected enough to pack Ayla a bag. Right, in what universe? It reminds me of changes that one blogger made regarding a baby gate. The baby gate then became the focus of much discussion; people said the fact that the story surrounding the baby gate changed was important. The same can be said about the pajamas.
Jessica insisted that she bought the pajamas. I believe her. She bought the pajamas, but she did not give them to Justin. She held on to them and planted them almost 5 months later. You may ask why she just didn't take the pajamas off of Ayla and plant those? It would be too risky. In order to do that, she would have to visit whoever has Ayla, or they would have to mail her the pajamas. In a state of paranoia after committing a crime, an offender would not be so brazen. Any and all links to either family are under close scrutiny. The timeline between Ayla being snatched and Jessica's hotel being searched are too close to allow for her to have had any contact with the people who are harboring Ayla.
This is why it was important for Jeffrey to all of a sudden start discussing the pajamas. That random "fact" added to the bottom of his blog post was not so random after all. The discussion of the pajamas had NOTHING to do with the other things discussed in that particular post. Food for thought, INDEED. When I first read those comments, I dismissed them in turn. Why would anyone be concerned with the tiny details of this case. I submit to you, the devil is in the details.
I realize that some people may also wonder how Jessica knew Ayla would go missing in the "Daddy's Princess" pajamas. She didn't. But having pajamas in Ayla's size would allow her to plant the pajamas and when they were "found" she could say that Justin was lying about what Ayla was wearing when she went missing. There is a lot of wiggle room. Maybe this kidnapping was very well planned out. Trista had from October 22, the day Justin didn't return Ayla to her, until December 17 to hatch a plan to get her baby back.
Thoughts?
First of all, why is Jeffrey's blog vanished? And his Facebook? I won't make any insinuations there, I am just curious about the timing. In order to take a break, one simply has to log out. Why wouldn't you want the blog to still be preserved and available to the public? That's the only way to get and keep the information out there. Numerous news articles link to the blog...now people will be re-routed somewhere else. That blog is a treasure trove of information. HMMM...
Secondly, I heard from a person, who heard from a person, who heard from another person, that another person was told, that another person has reason to believe that one of the items found is going to be Ayla's pajamas. Yes, the infamous "Daddy's Princess" pajamas that Ayla was reportedly wearing on the night she vanished.
I find this possibility very interesting. I'll start by showing you comments about the pajamas, then I will discuss.
Now, after reading that, it seems like a pretty juvenile disagreement, right? Jessica says she bought the pajamas, Phoebe says she bought the pajamas. Jessica INSISTS that she bought the pajamas, but Jeff says it's also plausible that Phoebe did buy them. Let's not forget that Jeff also said this:
That in itself sounds weird. Does anyone buy clothes hoping to send a message to someone? Isn't that rather childish? Why use a child and her clothes to communicate, instead of voicing your concerns to the adult? Only in Maine. ???
There are a few scenarios to explore, assuming that the pajamas were one of the items found. I will not compose an actual theory, until it's confirmed that pajamas were in fact found. I will give my rather random thoughts, and maybe some of you will add yours.
Here we go:
Phoebe buys Ayla the "Daddy's Princess" pajamas before Justin even gets custody of Ayla. Jessica, of course, has seen the pajamas and would probably know where to purchase them. I'm not familiar with Waterville or Maine, but I'm thinking small towns and cities, not a lot of shopping variety. Even if I'm wrong about that, I think it's still reasonable to assume that Jessica would know where to buy identical pajamas to the ones Phoebe has purchased. When she would have purchased them is beyond me. It could have been after Ayla went to live with Justin, it could have been after Ayla disappeared.
Fast forward. Ayla vanishes, and she just so happens to be wearing the pajamas that Jessica says she has purchased and given to Justin. That's an even bigger slap in the face, considering that Jessica says she bought the pajamas hoping that Justin would "live up" to the saying on the pajamas.
After almost 5 months, the pajamas are found---but not Ayla. The DiPietro family is suspected by the masses, but why would they have any reason to remove Ayla's clothes before hypothetically discarding her body? It's not as though finding Ayla deceased in the river would be any worse if she was wearing clothes that are bloodstained. Also, there's no indication that she was a victim of sexual abuse (I hate to even type that, but clothing removed could indicate a sexual element). Why would her pajamas be found, and why would she not be wearing them?
Speculation ONLY:
It was important for Jessica to say that she GAVE the pajamas to Justin when he came to get Ayla. This is another point where Jeffrey changed the timeline. At first, Justin waited downstairs, now Justin actually entered the apartment. Jessica refused to open the door, and did not want Justin to take Ayla. Ayla was traumatized, to the point of biting an officer, but Jessica remains calm and collected enough to pack Ayla a bag. Right, in what universe? It reminds me of changes that one blogger made regarding a baby gate. The baby gate then became the focus of much discussion; people said the fact that the story surrounding the baby gate changed was important. The same can be said about the pajamas.
Jessica insisted that she bought the pajamas. I believe her. She bought the pajamas, but she did not give them to Justin. She held on to them and planted them almost 5 months later. You may ask why she just didn't take the pajamas off of Ayla and plant those? It would be too risky. In order to do that, she would have to visit whoever has Ayla, or they would have to mail her the pajamas. In a state of paranoia after committing a crime, an offender would not be so brazen. Any and all links to either family are under close scrutiny. The timeline between Ayla being snatched and Jessica's hotel being searched are too close to allow for her to have had any contact with the people who are harboring Ayla.
This is why it was important for Jeffrey to all of a sudden start discussing the pajamas. That random "fact" added to the bottom of his blog post was not so random after all. The discussion of the pajamas had NOTHING to do with the other things discussed in that particular post. Food for thought, INDEED. When I first read those comments, I dismissed them in turn. Why would anyone be concerned with the tiny details of this case. I submit to you, the devil is in the details.
I realize that some people may also wonder how Jessica knew Ayla would go missing in the "Daddy's Princess" pajamas. She didn't. But having pajamas in Ayla's size would allow her to plant the pajamas and when they were "found" she could say that Justin was lying about what Ayla was wearing when she went missing. There is a lot of wiggle room. Maybe this kidnapping was very well planned out. Trista had from October 22, the day Justin didn't return Ayla to her, until December 17 to hatch a plan to get her baby back.
Thoughts?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)