4.30.2012

Rethink It...

Fundamental flaw?



Click to enlarge...makes no sense. TRY AGAIN!

So I'd like to ask, again, what connects this IP address to CAP? Do you have the IP address of this blog? NO, because it's hosted on Google. Do you have HER actual IP address?  Do you have any other information that connects CAP to this blog? You can see from the map that her address DOES NOT match where my IP address supposedly pings from. You simply have an IP address that pings from a city near her, so you're giving her credit for MY blog. She fit the theory, so you ran with it. HMMM....That's piss running down your leg---it's not raining.

Explanation?

UPdate 1: 10:57pm

40 comments:

  1. still no clues4/30/12, 5:44 PM

    I can't enlarge when I click on the picture. Why is that every time I google "just stop the lies blogspot" your blog doesn't appear any more but only "Justice for Ayla" ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. After all this time I still do not understand why it matters who you are.
    What do some think it will accomplish to know your identity?

    Can some of you out there explain to me why it matters so much to you, to know the identity of this blog owner. What is your purpose?
    How does knowing the identity affect Ayla, or finding her?
    Can you not see how this obsession by some has caused problems for innocent persons.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Looking At The Facts4/30/12, 8:30 PM

    I will admit it is so comical. People trying to track you Obscure is like watching a dog try to catch its tail.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't care who he is either. I just appreciate having a site to go to that people can look at other angles besides one.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes, it is comical, at times.

    Hey, but we are all Obscure aren't we? LOL

    There are some nasty, hateful people out there!!!

    Be careful Obscure, keep protecting yourself. Maybe the truth will eventually come out!

    signed: getreapeople

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, all of the people who post here are really me---posting under made up names and fictional accounts. You are me. Love it or leave it. =)

      Delete
    2. Yeah, so I've read several times. LOL

      Delete
    3. 24.218.184.12

      Anonymous huh?

      Delete
    4. West's Encyclopedia of American Law:
      Impersonation

      Top
      Home > Library > Law & Legal Issues > Law Encyclopedia
      This entry contains information applicable to United States law only.

      The crime of pretending to be another individual in order to deceive others and gain some advantage.
      The crime of false impersonation is defined by federal statutes and by state statutes that differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. In some states, pretending to be someone who does not actually exist can constitute false impersonation. For example, suppose Bill attempts to evade prosecution for a crime by giving the arresting officer a fictitious name and address. In Colorado, where "[a] person who knowingly assumes a false or fictitious identity and, under that identity, does any other act intending unlawfully to gain a benefit for himself is guilty of criminal impersonation," Bill could be charged with a crime (Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 18-5-113(1) [West 1996]). In this situation, the benefit Bill hopes to realize is avoiding prosecution, so that element of the offense has been satisfied. To be charged, the defendant does not need to seek a monetary benefit from the impersonation.
      In New York, giving only a fictitious name does not constitute false impersonation. Under New York law, criminal impersonation is committed when an individual "[i]mpersonates another and does an act in such assumed character with intent to obtain a benefit or to injure or defraud another" (N.Y. Penal Law § 190.25 [McKinney 1996]). In other words, it is illegal to impersonate a real person, but not a fictitious one. Thus, if Carol forges Ann's name on checks made out to Ann so that Carol can cash the checks, Carol could be guilty of false impersonation — but only if Ann is a real person. Such laws are designed to protect innocent people from the losses they may incur owing to the wrongful acts of others and to restore any loss of dignity and reputation they may have suffered as a result of impersonation.
      Most state laws also provide that the impersonation of a public official is a criminal act. In Texas, impersonating "a public servant with intent to induce another to submit to his pretended official authority or to rely on his pretended official acts" is a crime (Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 37.11 [West 1996]). Depending on the jurisdiction, the public servant being impersonated does not always have to actually exist. For example, suppose Carl pulls over a driver, shows her a fake police badge, and reprimands her for speeding but tells her that he will not arrest her if she pays him $50. Carl's actions constitute the crime of false impersonation, in addition to any other crimes, including extortion, that may apply to the situation. Thousands of criminal reports are filed every year by individuals victimized in various ways by persons impersonating police officers.
      Under federal law, pretending to be "an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States" in order to demand or obtain "any money, paper, document, or thing of value" can result in a fine as well as imprisonment for up to three years (18 U.S.C.A. § 912). Like state false impersonation statutes, the federal law also seeks to protect interests such as the dignity and prestige of individuals, especially those who hold federal office. Federal statutes also prohibit other types of impersonation, including pretending to be a U.S. citizen; pretending to be a U.S. officer or employee attempting to arrest or search a person or search a building; pretending to be a creditor of the United States or a foreign official; and pretending to be an agent or member of 4-H or of the Red Cross.


      Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/impersonation#ixzz1tahumEH3

      Delete
    5. Online Harassment: New Texas Internet Law Goes Into Effect

      Don’t mess with anyone in Texas online. Effective September 1, 2009, a new Texas law makes it a crime to engage in various activities on commercial social networking sites or by e-mail, instant messaging etc. You can read the actual text of the bill below. Although self-explanatory (to lawyers at least), it seems pretty clear that Texas lawmakers don’t want people impersonating others on the Internet in order to harm, threaten, intimidate, or defraud anyone. The law also covers text messaging. Note that depending on the activities involved, the crime can be either a Class A Misdemeanor or a 3rd degree felony.
      Expect there to be legal challenges to the constitutionality of this law. That being said, you don’t want to be the person arrested under it who has to pay the legal bills for that challenge.
      12/16/2009 Update - Please note that I will not be handling any cases involving this law. Consult law enforcement regarding harassment. For civil claims, consult an attorney who specializes in litigation with defamation case experience.
      H.B. No. 2003
      AN ACT
      relating to the creation of the offense of online harassment.
      BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
      SECTION 1. Chapter 33, Penal Code, is amended by adding
      Section 33.07 to read as follows:
      Sec. 33.07. ONLINE HARASSMENT. (a) A person commits an
      offense if the person uses the name or persona of another person to
      create a web page on or to post one or more messages on a commercial
      social networking site :
      (1) without obtaining the other person’s consent; and
      (2) with the intent to harm, defraud, intimidate, or
      threaten any person.
      (b) A person commits an offense if the person sends an
      electronic mail, instant message, text message, or similar
      communication that references a name, domain address, phone number,
      or other item of identifying information belonging to any person:
      (1) without obtaining the other person’s consent;
      (2) with the intent to cause a recipient of the
      communication to reasonably believe that the other person
      authorized or transmitted the communication; and
      (3) with the intent to harm or defraud any person.
      (c) An offense under Subsection (a) is a felony of the third
      degree. An offense under Subsection (b) is a Class A misdemeanor,
      except that the offense is a felony of the third degree if the actor
      commits the offense with the intent to solicit a response by
      emergency personnel.
      (d) If conduct that constitutes an offense under this
      section also constitutes an offense under any other law, the actor
      may be prosecuted under this section, the other law, or both.
      (e) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that
      the actor is any of the following entities or that the actor’s
      conduct consisted solely of action taken as an employee of any of
      the following entities:
      (1) a commercial social networking site ;
      (2) an Internet service provider;
      (3) an interactive computer service, as defined by 47
      U.S.C. Section 230;
      (4) a telecommunications provider, as defined by
      Section 51.002, Utilities Code; or
      (5) a video service provider or cable service
      provider, as defined by Section 66.002, Utilities Code.
      (f) In this section:
      (1) ” Commercial social networking site ” means any
      business, organization, or other similar entity operating a website
      that permits persons to become registered users for the purpose of
      establishing personal relationships with other users through
      direct or real-time communication with other users or the creation
      of web pages or profiles available to the public or to other users.
      The term does not include an electronic mail program or a message
      board program.
      (2) “Identifying information” has the meaning
      assigned by Section 32.51.
      SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2009.

      Delete
    6. Thanks for posting this. Those who are impersonating CAP on Myspace, Twitter, Facebook or wherever else, be warned. LE is already aware! =)

      Online impersonation is a FEDERAL crime!

      Delete
    7. And CAP lives in TX, so you better watch out! lol Don't mess with Texas. Whoever sent the tweet with her address/name/phone number, WHAT YOU GONNA DO WHEN THEY COME FOR YOU!!!

      Yikers

      Delete
  6. I think I left the "l" out of my signature,. "getrealpeople". Don't want anything to get started from my typo!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yikes, I made an error as well. In my comment at 4:45, the last sentence should have a question mark.
      I think it could be an exclamation point as well.

      This fake profile, is much like Selena in that regards.
      I make typo's and misspell words at times, and I don't much care.

      Delete
  7. Don't forget me. I am yet another alias of Lies/Obscure. LOL

    ReplyDelete
  8. *stands up* I am Lies/Obscure.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Selena Johnson4/30/12, 11:27 PM

    *stands up* I am Lies/Obscure.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Okay, you started off iffy but okay. Now you're just spamming the blog. Run along little musk rat...

      Delete
    2. Now look. Blog clutter. Thanks alot anon @ 10:37, 10:38, 10:39, 10:40 and 10:41.

      Back on topic...
      They were so stupid to attack a blogger when they could have been A-C-T-U-A-L-L-Y helping a missing child be found. Or if they couldn't find it in their cold, vile little hearts to care more about a baby girl than attacking anyone who disagreed with them, at the very least they could check their own facts and stop causing more and more drama with their false accusations.

      Hey look! I'm Obscure too! Okay, no I'm not. I haven't been to texas in almost 5 years.

      Delete
  16. yeah, you need an exorcism alright. torturing you may night be easy. LMAO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is your 20th comment, all with the most irrelevant bullshit. I'm not shutting down. You can move on now, I'm sure you have to wake up early to go flip burgers. The only comments of yours that I will approve are ones that say "would you like fries with that." That's all you're good for.

      You are not as smart as Tori has led you to believe you are. No matter how many times you change your IP, it all traces back to you. It just tells me New IP/Old IP. LOL You're a riot though.

      An illiterate zombie is trying to strong arm me on the interwebz. kEwL bEaNs.

      Delete
    2. keep goooiiinnngggg. *unphased*

      Delete
    3. Hey Obscure, be careful. We Mainers & our illiteracy are rubbing off on you.

      It's unfazed.

      You're welcome.

      Delete
  17. I SLEPT ALL DAY JUST TO HAVE A GOOD TIME TONIGHT.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. & you sure are having fun! LOL Even though half of the shit you type will not be seen here, have fun!

      I'm working on a really good post about you though, so stay tuned!

      Delete
  18. Courtney Roberts' sister collected a large and expensive amount of drugs for sale. How did she pay for it? Did she get it on credit? Does she owe on it?


    HOW MANY PERCS DOES JUSTIN SNORT?

    ReplyDelete
  19. "I have no idea what happened to Ayla, or who is responsible," he said. "I will not make accusations or insinuations towards anyone until the police have been able to prove who's responsible for this.

    Lie

    ReplyDelete
  20. Please be grateful for what you have. I know what I don’t have.


    The truth is the truth and when the case is solved, it will be out there


    The truth is the truth, how many more times are we going to hear this? What is the truth Justin?

    "What you're doing isn't right. You may think what you're doing is right for Ayla, but it's not. You have no right. You're not her parent. She belongs home with her family," DiPietro said

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It appears that what Justin is saying is that he's not going to get involved in all this disgusting slinging of lies and gossip, but rather wait for the truth (that he hasn't taken or harmed his little girl) to be obvious to one and all.

      It's not hard to understand someone's words if you're actually listening. ;)

      Delete
  21. I guess no one could answer my questions.
    I didn't think so.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To S. - I am sure people have answered your questions and this blog owner hasn't approved of the answers. Either way, I'll give it a shot!

      After all this time I still do not understand why it matters who you are.
      What do some think it will accomplish to know your identity?

      - People want Obscure to be known because of the same attention getting techniques Obscure is trying to use. She is vile, disrespectful and contradictory. She is someone who at first said was 80% positive someone in the home had done something to poor Ayla, but not spends her days blogging about members of the maternal family and members of other blogs, even going as far as to harp on someone for having a heart attack and blogging to pass time. She is trying to tear down other individuals for the same things she complains are happening to her. Any view, other than her drama filled "Trista did it" will be smashed by her and anyone that speaks up to her is in danger. Hell, she even tried pinpointing what city I live in on this blogs comment section. For everyone to see. She is hiding behind anonymity which typically isn't an issue, but when you are using that mask to do hateful, spiteful things - people deserve to know who you are and you deserve to live in shame.

      Can some of you out there explain to me why it matters so much to you, to know the identity of this blog owner. What is your purpose?

      - The purpose? See above. This blogger gets S&Gs about playing the running and denial game, even when she has been correctly outed by many. The purpose is to get this disgusting excuse for a human being to be known by all.

      How does knowing the identity affect Ayla, or finding her?

      - It doesn't. Not does this blog. Review all the posts, how many are about finding Ayla? How many are about scenarios in the house, how many are about fact? Not many. Now go tally how many are hate filled, self serving rants. Point proven? This blogger does not care or wish to find Ayla. She does, however, want the attention that she is getting.

      Can you not see how this obsession by some has caused problems for innocent persons.

      - I can. Like I mentioned earlier, even I, someone who comments very infrequently on Ayla blogs, have been attacked by this blogger. Right out in the open, this blogger put where she thought my city to be. I've seen her post work places of other innocent commenter and attacking fellow bloggers on their own personal beliefs. She attacks Trista, Jeff and Jessica. New theories are fine but when you admittedly said you are 80% sure that the rest of the world is right and someone in the house was responsible, why dedicate so much time and hate to support your 20% theory? Get real.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for at least sharing your thoughts, I do appreciate that.

      So basicly you are saying the only purpose of knowing the identity is because you & others believe you have the right to know. You want him or her known so that he or she will be shamed.
      Correct?

      My thoughts are,

      Your comments were more to the blogger than me, but thast's okay.

      You basicly don't like the blog and it's post. You don't like that he or she attacks Trista, Jeff and Jessica.
      Have you read "The Basis Of This Blog", it explains that the basis is not entirely about Ayla. I think that's what many people aren't understanding.
      Seriously, if you don't like the blog and it's contents why do you read here?
      If I had such feelings as yours about a blogger, a blog, and it's contents I wouldn't be reading it.

      I'm not so sure that the rest of the world believes that someone in the DiPietro home killed or disposed of Ayla. I'm a part of the world, and I believe there is a good possibility that Ayla was abducted.

      I personaly do not care who this blogger is. It's not becasue I like the blog either. I don't care who any of the bloggers are, or any of their personal information.
      I think they have the right to their opinions, thoughts and beliefs, and the right to voice them.

      Delete
  22. Lookup results for 24.218.184.12 from whois.lacnic.net server:

    Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc RW2-NORTHEAST-5 (NET-24-218-0-0-1) 24.218.0.0 - 24.218.255.255
    Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc NEW-ENGLAND-13 (NET-24-218-128-0-1) 24.218.128.0 - 24.218.255.255


    -------------
    Lookup results for 24.218.184.12 from whois.ripe.net server:

    inetnum: 24.136.0.0 - 24.255.255.255
    netname: NON-RIPE-NCC-MANAGED-ADDRESS-BLOCK
    descr: IPv4 address block not managed by the RIPE NCC
    remarks: ------------------------------------------------------
    remarks:
    remarks: Networks in this range are not in use in
    remarks: the RIPE NCC service region.
    remarks:
    remarks: You can find the whois server to query, or the
    remarks: IANA registry to query on this web page:
    remarks: http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
    remarks:
    remarks: You can access databases of other RIR's at:
    remarks:
    remarks: AFRINIC (Africa)
    remarks: http://www.afrinic.net/ whois.afrinic.net
    remarks:
    remarks: APNIC (Asia Pacific)
    remarks: http://www.apnic.net/ whois.apnic.net
    remarks:
    remarks: ARIN (Northern America)
    remarks: http://www.arin.net/ whois.arin.net
    remarks:
    remarks: LACNIC (Latin America and the Carribean)
    remarks: http://www.lacnic.net/ whois.lacnic.net
    remarks:
    remarks: ------------------------------------------------------
    country: EU # Country is really world wide
    org: ORG-IANA1-RIPE
    admin-c: IANA1-RIPE
    tech-c: IANA1-RIPE
    status: ALLOCATED UNSPECIFIED
    mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT
    mnt-lower: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT
    mnt-routes: RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT
    source: RIPE # Filtered
    organisation: ORG-IANA1-RIPE
    org-name: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
    org-type: IANA
    address: see http://www.iana.org
    remarks: The IANA allocates IP addresses and AS number blocks to RIRs
    remarks: see http://www.iana.org/ipaddress/ip-addresses.htm
    remarks: and http://www.iana.org/assignments/as-numbers
    admin-c: IANA1-RIPE
    tech-c: IANA1-RIPE
    mnt-ref: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT
    mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT
    source: RIPE # Filtered
    role: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
    address: see http://www.iana.org.
    admin-c: IANA1-RIPE
    tech-c: IANA1-RIPE
    nic-hdl: IANA1-RIPE
    remarks: For more information on IANA services
    remarks: go to IANA web site at http://www.iana.org.
    mnt-by: RIPE-NCC-MNT
    source: RIPE # Filtered

    ReplyDelete
  23. @Anon
    How is Justin lying? He has not made accusations or insinuations. When some might agree it would be very easy for him to do so. And he has simply maintained he is not responsible for what happened to his daughter. You can say he is lying about that but because you think it does not make it so. He is steadfast in his belief that his daughter is alive. And that the truth will indeed tell itself. However he maintains he does not know that truth to tell.

    ReplyDelete

ALL comments subject to removal. MODERATION becomes necessary when ignorance shows up. Don't be that person!